We currently migrate to MediaWiki from our old installation, but not all content has been migrated yet. Take a look at the Wiki Team page for instructions how to help or browse through our new wiki at wiki.linux-vserver.org to find the information already migrated.
In addition to the bare minimum, there are a number of modifications that are not mandatory, but have proven extremely useful over time.
It was very soon discovered that some features require a flag, a kind of switch to turn them on and off separately for each Linux-VServer, so a simple flag-word was added.
This flag-word supports quite a number of flags, a flag-word mask, which allows to tell what flags are available, and a special trigger mechanism, providing one-time flags, set on startup, that can only be cleared once, usually causing a special action or event.
Here is a list of planned and mostly implemented Context Flags, available in the development branch of Linux-VServer:
See Example [XX]
As the Linux Capabilities have almost reached the maximum number that is possible without heavy modifications to the kernel, it was a natural step to add a context-specific capability system.
The Linux-VServer context capability set acts as a mechanism to fine tune existing Linux capabilities. It is not visible to the processes within a context, as they would not know how to modify or verify it.
In general there are two ways to use those capabilities:
The difference between the Context Flags and the Context Caps is more an abstract logical separation than a functional one, because they are handled very similar.
Again, a list of the Context Capabilities and their purpose:
Some properties of a context are useful to the admin, either for keeping an overview of the resources, to get a feeling for the capacity of the host, or for billing them in some way to a customer.
There are two different kinds of accountable properties, those having a current value which represents the state of the system (for example the speed of a vehicle), and those which monotonically increase over time (like the mileage).
Most of the state type of properties also qualify for applying some limits, so they are handled specially. this is described in more detail in the following section.
Good candidates for Context Accounting are:
See Example [E41]
Most properties related to system resources, might it be the memory consumption, the number of processes or file-handles, or the current network bandwidth, qualify for imposing limits on them.
To provide a general framework for all kinds of limits, Context Limits allow the configuration of three different values for each limit-able resource: the minimum, a soft limit and a hard limit (maximum).
At the time this is written, only the hard limits are supported and not all of them are actually enforced, but here is a list of current and planned Context Limits:
Additionally the context limit system keeps track of observed maxima and resource limit hits, to provide some feedback for the administrator.
See Example [E42]
One major difference between the Linux-VServer approach and Virtual Machines is that you do not have the virtualization part as a side-effect, so you have to do that by hand where it makes sense.
For example, a Virtual Machine does not need to think about uptime, because naturally the running OS was started somewhere in the past and will not have any problem to tell the time it thinks it began running.
A context can also store the time when it was created, but that will be different from the systems uptime, so in addition, there has to be some function, which adjusts the values passed from kernel to user-space depending on the context the process belongs to.
This is what for Linux-VServer is known as Virtualization (actually it's more faking some values passed to and from the kernel to make the processes think that they are on a different machine).
Currently modified for the purpose of Virtualization are:
See Example [E43]
Proc-FS Security provides a mechanism to protect dynamic entries in the proc filesystem from being seen in every context.
The system consists of three flags for each Proc-FS entry: Admin, Watch and Hide.
The Hide flag enables or disables the entire feature, so any combination with the Hide flag cleared will mean total visibility.
The Admin and Watch flags determine where the hidden entry remains visible; so for example if Admin and Hidden are set, the Host Context will be the only one able to see this specific entry.
See Example [E44] and [E45]
For some purposes, it makes sense to have an user-space tool to act on behalf of the kernel, when a process inside a context requests something usually available on a real server, but naturally not available inside a context.
The best, and currently only example for this is the Reboot Helper, which handles the reboot() system call, invoked from inside a context on behalf of the Kernel. It is executed, in Host side user-space to take appropriate actions - either reboot or just shutdown (halt) the specified context.
While the helper is designed to be flexible and handle different things in a similar way there are no other users of this helper at the moment. It might be replaced by an event interface in near future.
See Example [XX]